if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined')ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'bakeitafterall_com-leader-1','ezslot_9',110,'0','0']);__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-bakeitafterall_com-leader-1-0');The sliced potatoes and cheese sauce are alternately layered into a greased casserole dish, beginning with a layer of potatoes and ending with the cheese sauce on top.The dish is covered with aluminum foil and baked for 1 hour. Then the foil is removed and the potatoes are baked for an additional 15 minutes, or until brown and bubbly on top.
Flemings Potatoes
Update: This recipe for au gratin potatoes was originally published in November 2014. I made updates to the post below to include more information about how to make these creamy, cheesy jalapeño potatoes.
There are many different types of au gratin recipes out there. But, the most classic version uses potatoes. For example, you could use sweet potatoes or broccoli if you want to change it up. I personally love an au gratin with brussels sprouts. However, please be aware that the cooking time may vary depending on what you use.
Thank you so much for the sweet comment, Asha!! If you ever go to Flemings you MUST order their potatoes! Or you can stay home and make them for yourself! Cheers, my dear and thanks again for the love! xo
nutrition data for fleming's potatoes468 calories, 41 grams fat, 14 grams carbohydrates, 13 grams protein per serving. This recipe is low in carbs.Show full nutritional data (including Weight Watcher's Points , cholesterol, sodium, vitamins, and diabetic exchanges) more recipes like fleming's potatoes MARLENE'S POTATO KUGEL CORNFLAKE TOPPED POTATOES (HEART ATTACK POTATOES) HAM AND POTATO CASSEROLE BAKED POTATO CASSEROLE MEATLESS TATER TOT CASSEROLE CREAM CHEESE POTATOES WITH BACON reviews & comments for fleming's potatoes rebm47 Member since:Nov 5, 2021 REVIEW:
You may need to check your oven temperature. Ovens sometimes need to be recalibrated. Thinly sliced potatoes most definitely will cook in an hour at 350 degrees. Did you slice them thinly as instructed? Did you change serving sizes? We've made this recipe many times and it is never undercooked for us.
I was in the midst of developing a copycat recipe based on pure recollection but then traipsed across the actual recipe on their website, to which I was overjoyed to find. I kept it pretty much the same except for some slight changes here and there. When it was finally done I slipped my spoon into the creamy molten goodness and immediately knew, without even tasting it that it was going to be delightful, the potatoes so soft and yielding that it took hardly anything to scoop up and eat.
Take half the sliced potatoes and lay them evenly onto the baking pan. Pour in half of the cheese sauce, spreading it all over the potatoes. Top with the remaining potatoes and finish with the last of the cheese sauce, using a spoon or spatula to spread it around completely so it goes into every nook and cranny.
Cover with aluminum foil that has been sprayed with nonstick cooking spray. Bake in 350F. oven for 45 to 60 minutes or until potatoes are soft. Remove foil and finish under the broiler for a couple minutes to brown top.
The defendant Alston owned 400 acres of land on which the defendant Fleming held a trust deed securing a note for $50,000, dated December 12, 1946. In 1948, in two transactions, the plaintiff advanced funds for the purpose of financing the raising of potatoes on this land. In March, he advanced $40,000 and Fleming assigned to him the $50,000 note and trust deed and Alston gave him a crop mortgage in that amount as additional security. Goodwin received $51,544.90 from the proceeds of the potatoes, the last payment being made on September 11, 1948, and on that day he satisfied the crop mortgage and reassigned the trust deed [130 Cal. App. 2d 667] to Fleming. On the same day the parties entered into a second transaction, in order to finance a fall crop, and Goodwin advanced another $65,000, receiving a crop mortgage for $70,000 executed by the Alstons in his favor, a reassignment to him of the $50,000 note and trust deed held by Fleming, an assignment of another note and trust deed for $20,000 executed on that day by Alston in favor of Fleming, and an order on the potato broker for 4,000 sacks of potatoes. Admittedly, Goodwin received $15,958 in March, 1949 from the sale of the 4,000 sacks of potatoes. He also received in March and April, 1949, an additional $18,136.92 from the proceeds of the crop.
This action was brought in October, 1949, to foreclose these trust deeds and the crop mortgage, the plaintiff alleging that he had purchased the notes and trust deeds from Fleming and that Alston had conveyed the land to Fleming. Alston defaulted but Fleming filed an answer and cross-complaint on December 30, 1949, which was superseded by an answer and counterclaim filed on November 1, 1950, in which usury was charged and treble damages sought. With respect to the first transaction, the counterclaim alleged that usurious interest amounting to $11,544.90 had been collected by Goodwin. As to the second transaction, it was alleged that Goodwin had required a bonus of $5,000 for the $65,000 loan, and also a bonus of 4,000 sacks of potatoes for which he had received $15,958. It was also alleged that Goodwin had received $17,463.59 on account of the principal of the $65,000 obligation.
On the second trial, the jury specially found that both of these transactions were loans and not sales; that both loans were made to Fleming; that with respect to both loans it was Fleming who repaid the money which was paid; and that the 4,000 sacks of potatoes constituted a bonus for the $65,000 loan and was not a purchase of that amount of potatoes, as claimed by Goodwin. The court made findings accordingly and entered a judgment decreeing that Goodwin has no right, title or interest in the trust deeds and crop mortgage involved in the second transaction, and awarding Fleming a judgment against Goodwin in the amount of $18,261.65. In arriving at this result Fleming was given credit for the bonus and interest paid on the first transaction, $11,544.90; for interest on that amount at 7 per cent from September 11, 1948, to date of judgment, $4,359.17; for the potato bonus $15,958 trebled, $47,874; and for $2,019, being treble the $673.33 allocated by Goodwin to interest when the general payment of $18,136.92 was paid in March and April of 1949. Plaintiff has appealed from this judgment.
[1] Goodwin brought this action to enforce his right under the transaction, and it has been twice tried on the theory that he was the purchaser and owner of these securities, and not on the theory that he was a trustee foreclosing for the benefit of Fleming. He now contends that since the jury found, in effect, that these securities were pledged to him the law authorizes him to foreclose them and turn the proceeds [130 Cal. App. 2d 669] over to Fleming. In our opinion, the general law with respect to pledges does not require such a useless and inconsistent procedure, and such a change in position on appeal is not justified. [2] There was a dispute throughout both trials as to whether or not these were loans, as to who the borrower was if they were loans, and as to who made such payments as were made. These matters, with other issues, were decided on conflicting evidence, all parties were before the court, Fleming was then the owner of the land subject to the trust deeds, and the court in this equitable action could properly determine all issues and settle the entire controversy. [3] It having been found that these were loans which had been made to Fleming and that Fleming had made the payments thereon, the necessary basis for a setoff and counterclaim existed. The evidence, while conflicting, is sufficient to sustain the findings made that these were loans made by Goodwin to Fleming, and that such payments as were made were made by Fleming. All payments made were from the proceeds of potatoes grown and the evidence justifies the inference that these proceeds would otherwise have gone to Fleming. A counterclaim was proper in this action. (Stock v. Meek, 35 Cal. 2d 809 [221 P.2d 15].) [4] This counterclaim was not barred since the period had not run on it at the time this action was commenced. (Jones v. Mortimer, 28 Cal. 2d 627 [170 P.2d 893].)
It is further contended that Alston made all of the payments to Goodwin which were made, and that since no payments were made by Fleming he cannot recover on his counterclaim. It is pointed out that it was alleged in the first cross-complaint and the later counterclaim that the "defendants" paid these various amounts to Goodwin, and that in another action Fleming testified, in connection with these two transactions, that he considered himself a guarantor and not one of the parties borrowing the money. [5] While the evidence was conflicting with respect to the person to whom the loan was made, and the person who made such repayments as were made, these were questions of fact which were resolved against the appellant. [6] The payments all came from potatoes raised on this ranch delivered to the potato broker, who turned over the proceeds to Goodwin. Nothing had been paid on the trust deed prior to 1948, and the trust deed gave Fleming the right, in case of any default, to take the proceeds of the crops. The evidence, with the reasonable inferences therefrom, supports the findings and conclusions to the effect [130 Cal. App. 2d 670] that Fleming was financing the project in the hope of collecting on his trust deed, that he took charge of the venture, conducted the negotiations, and entered into these various agreements, and that he was in full and complete control of what was to be done with the proceeds from the crops grown. While the jury could have found otherwise, its finding that the payments were made by Fleming is sufficiently supported by the evidence. 2ff7e9595c
Kommentare